So I get The concept of the "new" way of weekly rewards.
Who is picking these? Why subject anyone on the platform to a negative reviewed game? ( clear pipe room ) +0 -19 rating.
Why should a objective for a weekly reward be to play a horrible game ? Is that not counterintuitive ?
Should the objectives be for some of the highlights of the platform ? Putting the best foot forward so to speak.
Or it could even go the opposite way.
All 3 will be Non rated games. Giving incentive to play them to rate them ? (This would be known)
As of now we are pushing an incentive to play
+0 -19 Negative game ( clear pipe room)
+14 -6 Mostly positive. ( block party )
+13 -17 Mixed (sausage survivors)
I'm just dumbfounded on the logic ?
Who is picking these? Why subject anyone on the platform to a negative reviewed game? ( clear pipe room ) +0 -19 rating.
Why should a objective for a weekly reward be to play a horrible game ? Is that not counterintuitive ?
Should the objectives be for some of the highlights of the platform ? Putting the best foot forward so to speak.
Or it could even go the opposite way.
All 3 will be Non rated games. Giving incentive to play them to rate them ? (This would be known)
As of now we are pushing an incentive to play
+0 -19 Negative game ( clear pipe room)
+14 -6 Mostly positive. ( block party )
+13 -17 Mixed (sausage survivors)
I'm just dumbfounded on the logic ?