i thought i'd take a page out from the developer's book and just do what he did- re-release the same thing. considering it's literally the same game, they may as well share my review. where do i start with this? do i start with the reviewer that has only ever left four reviews, all of which are positive reviews for this developer's "games"? maybe the fact that 19/20ths of his playtime are for this developer's games? yeah, definitely no playfund and review manipulation going on with this guy's alt account/buddy. or maybe i should start with how this game falsely advertises a "hand-drawn" style despite using 100% ai-generated assets with no disclosure. sure, lets just fucking lie, why not. actually maybe i should have started with how he had the gall to re-release this magnum opus of game design as an entirely seperate game, which shares identical gameplay systems and features but with ai-generated corgis instead of cats. between the descriptions for these games, the only difference is "Cat" being swapped to "Corgi". i'm sorry, but this is literally the shit that's literally gonna kill s&box. blatant, passionless ai-generated slop being pumped out that gets its reviews and playtime manipulated, while absolutely cucking genuine devs trying to get their passion projects noticed. report this.

I couldnt comprehend the thought process of adding a auto clicker detector to a game almost everyone is using to to hunt achievements for skins. That'll bring more people in, surely.

why

This game really think i would click manually in a clicker game LMAO.

this game bro

run of the mill slop clicker chock full of AI Generated assets and seemingly flanked with russian review bots to draw you in

AI slop clicker but the cat is cute.